IMFB, here is your response…finally! Sorry it has taken me so long!
“It’s the perfect trifecta…what could be better than living between a cheap grocery store, a Sheetz gas station, and a dirty, dive bar?!?” According to Fiance #1, the proximity of the aforementioned establishments to our shit hole apartment meant we were living on the most coveted slice of man ground on earth. Even though the apartment (with its brown shag carpeting and fake wood paneled walls) was less than ideal, its amazingly convenient location made it his perfectish, little palace. (Hell, he only slept, ate, and spent 50% of his time in that apartment, why does it matter how nice it is??? It’s got the trifecta!)
This same reasoning can be applied to boys and relationships (at least according to yours truly). They subconsciously do a little balancing equation…whoever they find that satisfies as many of their needs most conveniently wins. It’s simple, painless, and clear cut. If you meet the basic beer, burgers, sex needs and you’re convenient (either in personality, location, religious belief, fill in the blank), then you, dear lucky lady, are the winner of your very own boyfriend.
Now, let’s say you don’t have the convenience factor, and this boy dumps you. Don’t take the breakup (or the disappearing act) personally. You might be an absolutely fabulous, ridiculously amazing apartment in the sky, but you’re just slightly too far from the nearest dive bar. (Lame, but true). So it momentarily sucks that your ego has been bruised, but you’re a hot ass, bangin’ apartment and he’s well… just bangin’ a shit hole of an apartment with brown shag carpeting.
Sidenote: This does not apply to real men like Mr. Fuede McMandals and others. I’m seriously not convenient to Fuede. I am a gigantic pain in the ass. Thanks for putting up with all of my beautifully packaged poo.


8 responses so far ↓
Diane // June 30, 2008 at 2:49 pm |
Laughed out loud at this one! Great post!
Frank L // June 30, 2008 at 8:54 pm |
Yeah…lot of truth to this one…
xxNicky // July 1, 2008 at 5:23 pm |
You make a great point! Its a very simple reality and yet I’ve never thought about it this way… but do we do the same thing? I recently had the “opportunity” to start something up with someone, and I realized I was just going to soak up his attention because I needed it. Convenient fix, but not right, so I passed on it. Probably because I’ve been “the fix” before. Maybe its the swap-in swap-out convenience that really bothers me.
restaurantrefugee // July 1, 2008 at 5:38 pm |
Glad you made the exception for “real men.” This a sad but too true depiction of many a not so real man.
imfb // July 2, 2008 at 1:35 am |
So I’m totally a real man, right?
imfb // July 2, 2008 at 12:05 pm |
In all fairness though, my letter takes into account the times that something is fun but inconvenient. I think we need to combine our ideas into a unified theory of relationships.
fanfrickingtastic // July 2, 2008 at 12:27 pm |
Imfb, you are totally a real man or at least steadily working on it.
It’s true that your letter did take into account both fun and convenience, but inconvenient fun is always temporary UNLESS there is a foreseeable convenience.
xxNicky, I agree we totally do the same thing. I just feel like we are more up front about it…most of the time…sometimes…at least more than they are.
Ashley // July 2, 2008 at 3:46 pm |
HAHA I love it! SO true!